Mailbag
Please click here to post a new
thread
Rob Allen of Chairman, Eventia
02/12/2011
Enough awards already?
I attended the recent inaugural Brand Event Awards – produced as a collaboration between Event and Marketing magazines, both Haymarket publications. While I can understand the appeal of the concept, the event didn’t quite live up to expectations. This was possibly because it was poorly attended - by an audience of no more than 200. This may be a sign of the economic times, or simply because this is the Brand Event Awards’ first outing. Or possibly because they coincided with a competing ceremony, the UK Event Awards, held on the same night by publishers Carnyx.
These two were the latest in a flood of award ceremonies. In addition to these, over the last six weeks we have seen the Event Awards (Haymarket), the Eventia Awards (independent), the CIT Awards (Haymarket), the Field Marketing and Brand Experience Awards (Frank Publishing) and the MIMA Awards (CAT Publications). Still to come in the next few weeks are the IVCA’s Livecom Awards.
Haymarket Publishing alone were responsible for three of the above events – all targeting the live events and experiential marketing sector. Some people may not see much in common between, say, the MIMA and the Field Marketing and Brand Experience Awards, but many agencies are progressively broadening their sphere of activity to embrace B2C as well as B2B business, and could quite easily consider entering any or all of the above.
The mild inconvenience of having to get togged-up for so many awards events on a weekly basis masks two much more disturbing commercial implications. Firstly, all of them rely heavily on sponsorship from industry suppliers. These companies’ marketing budgets are already stretched paper thin and may well be reduced for 2012 in the light of the dire economic forecast. The collective pot just isn’t deep enough to go round.
Secondly, for those companies that believe in the excellent third-party endorsement that award wins provide, it is becoming increasingly difficult to know which to enter and where to draw the line. The entry periods for all these awards are between May and July – which puts agencies and their clients under immense pressure to prepare multiple submissions during a busy period. Our clients are beginning to lose respect and patience at being asked to approve the avalanche of entries landing in their inboxes.
I realise that as a seasoned award entrant on behalf of experiential agency TRO and as Chairman of Eventia I could be criticised for having one or more vested interests here, but this boils down to a matter of basic economics and common sense. We have reached the stage where the kudos surrounding awards programmes is becoming diluted by an over-crowded market place.
Perhaps it’s time for the industry to say 'less is more' and to consider a change of tack - either in the number or the timing of these programmes.
Rob Allen
Executive Chairman, TRO Group
Chairman, Eventia
Mark Dodds of Roythornes LLP
05/12/2011
Mr John Fisher of Fisher Moy International (FMI)
05/12/2011
Chris Parnham of Zibrant
21/11/2011
The risk imperative
The recent flooding in Thailand (Meetings and events continue to take place in flood-hit Thailand, www.meetpie.com, 8/11/11) is just the latest in a long line of international disasters this year which serve to demonstrate the need for the prioritisation of risk management expertise by agencies operating globally.
Never before have meetings and events been more international, adventurous and ambitious, and correlating with that is increased risk as well as greater operational challenges if things do go wrong. In addition to the potential for predictable problems represented by long-haul traveller health and safety, almost every week we are seeing political unrest and natural disasters which, on top of huge budgetary pressures, make it absolutely vital that agencies are properly prepared to help clients maintain their employees’ security and business continuity. This capability is now a fundamental driver of client confidence.
A proactive approach here is of critical importance, and as well as appropriate technology, significant investment in staff training should now be the norm. Scenario planning, case studies and a thorough understanding of how to conduct rigorous health and safety assessments are, for example, part of standard front-line employee knowledge at Zibrant. Local knowledge is also vitally important, and we routinely send staff on secondment abroad to help facilitate this. Equipping the team with appropriate skills is part of our own due diligence as employers and ensures that we can work effectively with clients to formulate and execute sound contingency-led policies and procedures.
Many events companies are already well-placed to provide in respect of crisis management, but those for whom it is less familiar territory should put it to the top of their agenda in order to continue to be of value and relevance in the global marketplace.
Chris Parnham
Managing director-operations, Zibrant